Christian
advice on marriage
Marital Closeness under God's Authority
When
two people join their lives together, how do they decide on direction?
What if one has habits or tastes that annoy the other? What if their
priorities are different? Secular marriages have no clear answer
to these questions. Generally, counselors suggest couples should
compromise or take turns in decision making. But these solutions
don't always work. Spouses wind up saying, "We decided your
way last time," and we open a new source of conflict. Then
there's this one: "I think this would be a good compromise."
"No, this would be a compromise!" Similarly, consider
how you would feel in this scenario: "We decided my way about
which movie to see last night, but now we have to decide your way
on which house to buy!"
Both
trading-off and compromising may be useful in some situations, but
are often problematic. Some decisions won't allow for compromise.
Suppose a couple don't agree in which area of town to live. If they
compromise, they may end up living in an area they both hate. This
is why, in real life we find that the more powerful partner usually
compels the weaker to comply with his or her agenda. Powerless partners
have to decide how much they are prepared to take. The choice seems
to be either slavery, perpetual power struggles or flight. Other
couples don't have a clearly more powerful spouse, and may engage
in constant wrangling over even the smallest things.
In
this illustration, we see two different people, each with their
own frame of reference which determines their views, their values,
their appetites, etc. Since the frame of references, or life experiences
are completely different from one another, they have no basis for
resolving differences.
When
other people's actions hurt or annoy us, what can we do? When we
simply can't get someone close to us to be reasonable, where do
we turn? We either try to make the other person change through force
or manipulation, or we learn to keep our distance. No wonder modern
people have trouble attaining intimacy in relationship!
With Christ, we have an alternative way of life. We're no longer
two people trying to get our own way. Is Christians, both partners
are concerned with discovering and following God's way. On
one hand, we have a reason for calling on the other person to change
based on the will of God. We have an obligation to be willing to
change ourselves in accordance with the will of God. Although we
could still disagree about what God wants at times, at least
we have some basis for agreement other than who has the most
power. Finally, in Christ we also have a basis for grace in relationships,
which means we can forgive negatives in our spouse-something we
may do in secular relationships if we judge it to be expedient,
but without any other reason.
The
paradigm of Christian couples living under the authority of God
includes benefits and sacrifices for both partners. Most of the
sacrifices are in the area of ego and selfishness. The benefits
are in the areas of closeness, the gratification of being used by
God, and the joy of loving deeply.
Marriage
Roles and Gender: In addition to the general idea of basing a
marriage on the will of God, Scripture teaches that the husband
should be the spiritual "head" in marriage. What does
this mean? Headship is a troubling concept in our day. We need to
understand it in context.
Being
the "head" in the biblical sense means the husband is
responsible to initiate love and self-sacrifice for the well-being
of his wife. It does not mean the husband must
be spiritually older than his wife, nor does it give the husband
a license to insist on his own way. He is only to call for God's
way. However, faithful exegesis of the relevant passages will show
that God affirms male leadership in the home.
Remember,
leadership in the biblical context is servant leadership.
Paul said husbands should "love your wives, just as Christ
loved the church and gave himself up for her." (Ephesians 5:25)
This is the kind of leadership Christ demonstrated when he let himself
be nailed on a cross for us. Jesus could be very authoritative,
but he did not come to selfishly boss people around. He said, "Even
the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give
his life as a ransom for many." (Mark 10:45) When Jesus gives
us a directive, it is not because he enjoys controlling us, but
because he is concerned for our welfare. He also extends an amazing
level of freedom to his followers, allowing us to defy his will
and still continue our relationship without rejection. He will discipline
us for our good, but he will never reject us. (Hebrews 13:5)
Coming
under such self-denying leadership poses no threat to our happiness.
A woman who submits to the servant leadership of a mature Christian
man should be letting herself in for a life where her husband devotes
himself to providing for her needs, protecting her and (yes) directing
her at times. A servant leader will not insist on his way in areas
where it is not possible to know objectively what God wants. He
will call for his wife to follow Christ along with himself, but
will graciously allow her to refuse his suggestions often. Like
Jesus, he will not compel obedience, but will seek to win it through
persuasion and love. The Lord doesn't force us to follow him; he
wants us to follow willingly.
Any
man who is eager to assume such a role of leadership has probably
not grasped what the Lord is saying in this passage. To be responsible
for initiating love-for initiating self giving-is a daunting role.
Properly understood, no husband would object if his wife offered
to lead the way in self-sacrifice for awhile. The role of head in
a marriage is not a role of privilege but of responsibility and
self-sacrifice.
Our
postmodern aversion to authority is incompatible with Christianity,
not only because it flies in the face of biblical teaching, but
because it is based on our fear of corrupt and self-serving authority
figures.
Servant
Leadership In Action
Christian
men should be spiritually mature enough to secure their wives' respect
and basic willingness to follow their leadership, contingent, of
course, on the higher authority of God.[footnote 2]
When the Bible refers to wives submitting to their husbands,
it essentially means wives should cultivate an attitude of respect
for their husbands.[footnote 3] "Respect"
in this context includes recognition of her husband as a legitimate
leader-an inclination to go along with her husband's direction when
possible. A wife who submits to her husband is free to suggest directions
or to question and challenge his direction. She is obligated to
point out when she believes he is violating God's will. But she
would turn away from self-willed resistance or manipulation.
Headship
does not mean that only wives should be willing to defer
to their spouses. In fact, willingness to defer to others for Christ's
sake is the foundation of all relationships in the Body of
Christ. The verb "submit" in Ephesians 5:22 is really
borrowed from verse 21: "submitting to one another in
the fear of (out of respect for) Christ. . . " Therefore, the
wife's submission to the husband within Christian marriage is grounded
in both spouses' willingness to defer to each other in love
as well as to other Christian friends in their church.[footnote
4] We are all to submit to Christ's moral leadership
whenever it is expressed through others.
All
of this means we should emphatically reject the view that submissive
wives let their husbands do all the thinking in the marriage. Neither
does it mean that Christian husbands can be bossy and controlling.
Biblical headship does not mean that the husband must decide on
every matter or even most matters pertaining to the household. Husbands
and wives should negotiate and agree on who will take responsibility
for bill paying, grocery shopping, car maintenance and other like
matters. Creative and critical discussion between spouses about
major decisions is also fully compatible with the
idea of headship. Such discussion is necessary for a healthy marriage.
If both spouses are committed to God and to the good of the other,
most decisions can and should be mutual, and only the weakest husband
would fear such discussions.
In
the rare cases in which husband and wife cannot agree on an important
decision, the husband who has proven himself as a servant leader
will usually be able to make a mature decision-either to hold for
his view if necessary, or to sacrificially let his wife have her
way.
Like
Christ, the Christian husband is to lead the way in demonstrating
a humble commitment to God's will rather than insisting on his own
will.
Jesus'
authority was valid because he did "not seek my own will, but
the will of him who sent" him. (John 5:30) He also explained
that he was willing to "lay down his life for the sheep."
(John 10:15) In the same way, the Christian husband is to lead the
way in demonstrating a humble commitment to God's will rather than
insisting on his own will. He should take the initiative to practice
sacrificial service to meet his wife's needs, even at his own personal
expense. Such husbands are usually able to secure their wives' trust
and respect.
Both
partners in a marriage should understand and agree on their concept
of headship before getting married. Christians differ on how they
interpret these passages, but however a couple understands them,
they need agreement. Those already married may also need to rethink
this area. If you are a married woman, are you comfortable responding
to the spiritual leadership of your husband? Or is the idea of following
your husband unrealistic or distasteful? Recognizing leadership
in the home may be especially difficult for women who have experienced
evil male authority figures, or who have adopted an ideology that
opposes the concept of gender roles.[footnote 5]
At other times, the husband's way of life makes it difficult
for the wife to take his leadership seriously.
Whatever
the causes, resolving these issues is important for Christian marriage.
Additional reading on the subject of headship may help.[footnote
6]
Footnotes
1.
See Ephesians 5:22-29.
2.
Christian wife should never follow morally wrong
directives from her husband. The principle of contingent, or conditional
obedience is well understood when it comes to secular authorities
as in Daniel 2:1-18; Acts 4:19,20; 5:29. Strangely however, some
commentators argue that wives should obey their husbands in an uncontingent
and unqualified way! The text often used to justify this position
is 1 Peter 3:5,6 which refers to Sarah's obedience to Abraham with
approval. Based on this passage, it is argued that even when Sarah
lied to Pharaoh by saying she was Abraham's sister (and nearly had
to commit adultery as a result) she was doing the right thing. However,
the passage does not condone this incident, but only commends her
attitude. In fact, God will hold individuals responsible for wrong
they do, even if they were ordered to do it, as the incident in
Acts 4:19,20 demonstrates. Notice also that the incident to which
1 Peter 3 refers involves a sin of omission, not one of commission.
The statement in vs. 1 that wives should obey husbands even if they
are disobedient to the faith means that the husband himself
is disobedient, not that his directives are morally wrong.
Related
topics
The
four Loves | The noble wife
| Christian
commitment | The Godly Husband
| what is love?
Christian Marriage | Christian
Divorce | Christian
marriage books
Christian advice on marriage @ christian
advice.net 2003
|